Saturday, January 16, 2016

Weekend reading

1. It is no surprise that ideological or political leanings can cloud our judgement about various apparently objective issues like the state of the economy. Accordingly staunch supporters of a party are less likely to acknowledge bad economic or other news when their party is in power. Times points to recent studies which show that it may be possible to overcome this partisan bias if we pay people responding to these questions, 
When survey respondents were offered a small cash reward — a dollar or two — for producing a correct answer about the unemployment rate and other economic conditions, they were more likely to be accurate and less likely to produce an answer that fit their partisan biases. In other words, when money was added to the equation, questions about the economy became less like asking people which football team they thought was best, and more like asking them to place a wager. Even a little bit of cash gets people to think harder about the situation and answer more objectively... 
The effect was even more pronounced when respondents were rewarded for honestly answering “I don’t know” when they didn’t have enough information. Otherwise, it appears that people will respond objectively to questions when they know the answer, but revert to their partisan biases when they don’t. The paper by Mr. John G Bullock, Alan S. Gerber, Seth J. Hill and Gregory A. Huber found that offering a $1 payment for a correct response and a 33-cent payment for an answer of “Don’t know” eliminated the entire partisan gap between Democrats and Republicans on questions about the economy.
Interestingly, in the paper by Mr. Prior, Gaurav Sood and Kabir Khanna, the cash payments became less effective at coaxing an accurate answer if the question mentioned the president by name. George W. Bush was president at the time of the survey, but by extension it appears that Americans can be more objective answering a question like “Is the unemployment rate lower or higher than it was seven years ago?” than a question like “Is the unemployment rate lower or higher than it was when Barack Obama became president?” even though as a factual matter those are the same question.
Among other things, these findings highlight the critical importance of framing and decision architecture while making surveys. Given that most surveys miss such nuances, it may be a good reason to take their findings with a pinch of salt.

2. The Eurasia group has this striking map of the growing influence of anti-immigrant nationalist parties in Europe on the back of economic weakness and surge in migrants fleeing the civil wars in the Middle East.
This can be a very important politically destabilizing factor in the region.

3. Spicejet, which was close to being grounded by end-December 2014, has engineered a dramatic turn-around, with three consecutive quarters of profits. The Economist has a fascinating description of the Spicejet turnaround, starting with the firms change in management,
He started by negotiating with aircraft-leasing firms for better terms and with lenders for fresh finance, and by injecting equity capital of his own. He cut jobs—and managers’ pay—and scrapped unprofitable routes. Then came a slew of efficiency measures which added up to big improvements in the performance of the carrier’s fleet. Pilots of its Bombardier Q400 turboprops, which serve second-tier cities, were told to step on the gas to shave a few minutes off each flight, making it possible to squeeze in one extra trip each day. The steel brakes on the wheels of its Boeing 737s were replaced with lighter carbon brakes, cutting fuel consumption. The number of in-flight magazines on each aircraft was reduced, and attendants began serving meals in cardboard boxes instead of on plastic trays—again, trimming the aircraft’s weight and cutting fuel burn.
More attention was paid to filling each plane’s tanks with just enough fuel, with a suitable safety margin, but no more. Pilots now lower their planes’ landing gear 7-8km from touchdown, instead of 14km as before; and on the ground they often now taxi on just one engine. Stocks of spare parts were improved at the carrier’s main bases, to get planes back in the air faster. SpiceJet’s aircraft spend roughly 13 hours a day in the air, whereas for other Indian airlines the figure is just 10-12 hours... On the revenue side, the airline has boosted its earnings from ancillary services such as on-board meals and seat selection.
4. Livemint points to the latest CMIE data which show a rise in the value of stalled projectsand declines in both public and private sector capex plans and new project announcements. Both the absolute volumes as well as proportion of stalled projects have been rising. 
Interestingly, in contrast to 19.42% of private projects just 4.82% of public projects are stalled. This four-fold differential may point to the far greater difficulty experienced by private sector in managing construction risks with its attendant challenges of site acquisition and permit clearances. One more to the growing list of reasons for adopting the model of public arms-length procurement followed by private contracting. 

5. This blog has long held the view that the concern with infrastructure projects is not that projects get delayed, because they get delayed everywhereFT draws attention to a UK National Audit Office report which says that a third (37) of the large government projects (106) due for delivery over the next five years are unlikely to fully deliver or will remain unfinished due to high staff turnover, skills shortages and poor risk management. The more fundamental concern is the lack of flexibility of restructure those projects and complete them at the earliest, conditional on them getting stuck. 

6. FT points to the rapid growth of quasi-sovereign bonds, assumed by state-owned entities, which thought not on the sovereign government's balance sheet has implicit government guarantee and therefore adds to the net sovereign liability. While the stock of EM quasi-sovereign bonds rose from $710 bn in 2014 to $839 bn by end-2015, the total stock of all external EM sovereign debt was just $750 bn at end-2015. Such shape-shifting is bound to further increase concerns about sovereign debt positions among EM economies.

But India has not been one of the major destinations for EM bond inflows. Despite the attractively priced low interest rates, reflecting their weak investment intentions, Indian corporates raised just $35.7 bn through domestic and off-shore debt markets in 2015, a drop of 28% over 2014 and the lowest in six years. Of this, just $8.9 bn was raised off-shore through 34 deals, compared with $18.8 bn and $35 bn over the previous two years. 

7. Spurred on by the cheap credit and corporate cash hordes (still $1.8 trillion with S&P 500 companies in the US) with limited investment opportunities, M&A deal-making scaled its highest ever volume at $4.59 trillion eclipsing the earlier record of $4.13 trillion in 2007, including 137 mega deals involving more than $5 bn.
In times of economic weakness, businesses see M&A as a susbstitute to organic growth. In sectors like pharmaceuticals, businesses have come to see M&A as a means to avoid the costs and uncertainties associated with conventional drugs discovery process. The FT writes that unlike 2007
... there is greater availability of cheap financing and the healthier state of corporate balance sheets. In 2007, the benchmark US 10-year Treasury yield sat at 4.6 per cent compared with 2.2 per cent today. And even after record levels of share repurchases in this cycle, companies in the S&P 500 index are still holding more than $1.8tn of cash, compared with $0.8tn back then. Both facts suggest there is ample firepower for companies to pursue transactions. Companies are also increasingly using their own equity to pay for deals. This year, 47 per cent of all takeover activity has been at least in part financed with stock, compared with 21 per cent in 2007.
8. Even as India's makes a massive manufacturing push, its exports have tanked big time, declining continuously for twelve months.
9. Livemint has another graphic that points to the skewed nature of bank credit allocation across sectors - housing makes up more than a third of total incremental credit, seven times industrial credit; personal consumption loans made up 58.4% of total incremental credit.
Note the small volumes - less than $2 bn of bank loans to manufacturing!

10. Finally, this puts in perspective the scale of decline in commodities prices,
As a result of reduced Chinese demand, 42 of the 46 commodities that the World Bank tracks traded at their lowest level since the early 1980s in 2015.

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Should I use a financial adviser to manage my portfolio

Should I use a financial adviser to manage my portfolio or should I save money by going it alone? - Sunil Mankotia, Banker,Thane

A: That depends on how comfortable you are doing it yourself. If you are familiar with the basic concept of asset allocation and you’re comfortable choosing investments, you shouldn’t have any trouble building a low-cost diversified portfolio on your own.

Potential access to important investment news when it is most valuable Professional advice that may help improve your investment results Expert help in determining the best way to allocate your assets A trained and objective professional who can help you avoid panic selling.

Understand your needs and help you formulate long-term investment goals and objectives.
Before making specific recommendations, your advisor should try to gain a whole picture of your past experience, lifestyle and goals, as well as your other investments and current financial situation. When are you planning to retire, for example? Do you have life insurance? Do you own real estate? How secure is your job?
Help you develop realistic expectations by discussing the risks and rewards of each investment.

Every investment choice has its strengths and weaknesses, and you should never feel less than fully informed. When you ask questions, or have doubts, you should expect your financial advisor to answer honestly, and help you develop a strategy that is both realistic and comfortable for you.

Match your goals and objectives with appropriate financial product.

You should expect your advisor to make clear and specific recommendations, and explain the reasons behind them in terms you can understand. Of course, the advisor should be confident and well informed about the management and portfolio strategies of any financial product or mutual funds recommended. Continually monitor your portfolio and help you interpret performance.

Your advisor cannot influence or predict a healthiness of financial product or fund's results. However, he or she should discuss results with you and help you judge your progress. You should feel that you can always ask your advisor, "How am I doing?"
Conduct regular reviews to ensure that your strategy continues to provide optimal results for you.

One of the most valuable services your advisor can provide is to help you "stay on course" with your investment program. But "staying on course" long term does not necessarily mean staying put. Expect your financial advisor to work with you to adjust your portfolio in response to any significant change in your lifestyle, priorities, assets or responsibilities.
But you don’t necessarily have to pay an adviser to get help. 

Most people have the bulk of their savings in bank fixed deposits. offer low-cost and target returns and date; the latter is a diversified funds and bond funds portfolio that becomes more conservative as you age. Many web site or online advisor also offer free tools to help you assess your investing options and assemble a portfolio appropriate for your age and risk tolerance. According to me it offer some kind of investment advice. Taking advantage of that advice can pay off. 

In a recent Financial survey done by me at reputed company of full-time workers, people who saved the most for retirement or any long term goal used online financial advice tools and educational materials provided on web site at more than double the rate of the lowest-scoring savers.

But the do-it-yourself approach requires time to monitor your portfolio and the discipline to adjust to different market conditions. You also have to keep your emotions in check when markets are volatile, which investors admit they have a hard time doing. In a survey 65% of investors say they struggle to avoid making emotional decisions about their money during market shocks.

Even more worrisome: 81% of investors say expectations for double digit gains going forward are realistic and 54% believe their portfolios will perform better this year than last year, when Index rose by 13%. according to the survey.

Coming off three consecutive years of market returns that exceed 10%, that kind of enthusiasm is not surprising. But historically, the stock market has averaged 7% annual gains. Having an objective investment adviser can help ground your expectations in reality. And there’s evidence that some investors do better getting some professional advice.
Median annual returns for fixed deposits and holders who got professional help through advisors managed portfolio were 3.32 percentage points higher than returns for people who invested on their own, even after taking fees into account.

If you decide to go the professional route, you have choices. An adviser at a large investment firm typically charges a fee of about 1% directly or indirectly of the assets he or she manages for you. A new type of investment service known as a “robo-adviser” uses computer algorithms to build low-cost portfolios and charges as little as 0.5% a year. but again it is robo.

You should consider enlisting a financial adviser who can do more than manage your investments. A certified financial advisor takes a more holistic approach to your portfolio. They can help you figure out whether you are on track with your savings and how other investment options fit into your planed goals. 

If you decide to go it alone, you’ll need to be vigilant about monitoring your plan, and should take advantage of any free advice available to you through financial website. But as you get nearer to retirement,consulting at least once with a professional and reputable financial adviser is a wise move.

Importance of An Advisor

With the variety of investment options available today, I suggest that you seek guidance from a financial advisor. Nearly every investment entails special risks that should be discussed with an experienced professional. Your investment goals are unique, and an advisor can help you find the right financial product or fund to match your needs.

When taking a full-service approach to investing, you put a professional's training, knowledge, expertise and resources to work for you. Consider these benefits:

You may be thinking that the Internet and financial planning software can cater to all these needs, but although they are convenient tools, they cannot equal the personal attention and experience of a professional. He or she can make that difference in helping you manage your financial future.

What to Expect From a Financial Advisor

The key for investors is to define and recognise the value of professional financial services, and then insist on getting that value. When you pay a sales charge or a fee, what can you expect a professional to do for you? Your advisor should at least:
These are the basic services that investors should expect from their financial advisors. Beyond the basics, many investors could use even more specialised assistance, like advice on retirement plan distribution options, setting up and servicing retirement plans for small businesses and self-employed individuals, developing tax-advantaged strategies for children's college education, insurance, estate, and trust planning; and year-end mutual fund tax advice. If you need specialised services, there are many financial advisors who can help you obtain the help you need.



Ritesh.Sheth CWM®
CHARTERED WEALTH MANAGER

              Helping you invest better...  

Allaudin Bldg Shop No 1,Manchubhai Road,Malad East,Mumbai - 400097.
Shop No.9,Param Ratan Bldg,Jakaria Road,Malad West,Mumbai - 400064.
Tel:28891775/28816101/28828756/28823279. CELL:9930444099  
www.tejasconsultancy.co.in | E-mail Us: ritesh@tejasconsultancy.co.in
Go Green...Save a tree. Don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary

Disclaimer:
This emailer or blog is addressed to and intended for the investors of Ritesh Sheth & Tejas Consultancy only and is not spam. You are advised to contact Ritesh Sheth & Tejas Consultancy to clarify any issue that you may have with regards to any information contained in this emailer or blog.The views are personal. Ritesh Sheth & Family or Tejas Consultancy does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information in this emailer or blog and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of such information. Ritesh Sheth & Family or Tejas Consultancy does not have any liability to any person on account of the use of information provided herein and the said information is provided on a best effort basis. In case of investments in any of schemes, please read the offer documents carefully before investing.

To unsubscribe from future mailer Please e-mail: 
info@tejasconsultancy..co.in

Friday, December 18, 2015

It does not hurt to be corrupt!

Why rent seeking is pervasive

Here is how the decision-tree for a public servant making a choice between remaining honest or becoming corrupt would look



Assume that the rent payout is Rs 100,000. Assume that the probability of a corrupt official getting caught is just 10% (a good approximation if we take the full career of officials even in the more corrupt departments). Assume also that only 25% of those accused of corruption actually end up being punished. And of those punished, it is not unreasonable to assume that just 10% get dismissed from service (in fact the actual number would be insignificantly small, or infinitesimal), while the rest escape with administrative penalties like cut in increments or reduction in ranks, all of which have the effect of reducing their salaries.

One of the important points to be borne in mind is that unlike other forms of theft and pilferage where it is easy to recover the booty, it is almost impossible to recover the rents collected by the officials. Therefore, whatever has been amassed is more likely to remain with the official. Further, except in cases where departmental materials have been diverted or government funds have been mis-appropriated, the major share of corruption cases involve taking bribes or personal favors for doing official functions. It is not practical nor possible to reverse such favors even if the employee is punished. In other words, the punishment only imposes an administrative penalty.

Let us make the following assumptions. We can assume a rent payoff of Rs 100,000. Assume that the financial implication of the reduction in salary is small enough to be irrelevant over the career of the official (a typical one or two increment cut in salary, with cumulative effect, has only marginal impact). Assume that the bribe required to get himself out is half the rent gained, or Rs 50,000. Assume that the environment has become so permissive that the peer-group stigma of being corrupt is minimal. Assume also that the salary foregone if dismissed is ten times (and at higher levels of the officialdom, the reverse is the case!) the rent gained, ie Rs 1000,000.

In the circumstances, the pay-off for each category would look like this
1. The expected value of a honest public servant is his salary
2. The expected value of a corrupt official, P(corrupt)
=
P(not getting caught)x(Salary+rent)+
P(caught)xP(bribe and escape)x(salary+rent-bribe) +
P(caught)xP(punished)xP(dismissed)x(rent+shame+salary foregone) +
P(caught)xP(punished)xP(penalized)x(lower salary+rent+shame)
= (approx)
Salary + 0.9x100,000 + 0.1x0.75x(100,000-50,000) + 0.1x0.25x0.1x(100,000-1000,000) + 0.1x0.25x0.90x100,000 = Salary + 90000+3750-2250+2250 = Salary + Rs 93750

As can be seen, the expected pay-off from taking a bribe of Rs 100,000 lakhs is salary + Rs 93,750. Now you decide whether to be corrupt or not!

why corruption was pervasive, arguing that it pays to be corrupt. A newer version of the decision-tree diagram below (please click to blow-up) captures the expectations and deterrents facing officials when they take bribes

A cursory examination of the extant administrative processes on disciplinary action would reveal that each of the probabilities - p, q, r, a, and b - are far closer to zero than one. Given this, the likelihood of the biggest punishment of a person being caught taking bribes and dismissed from service is (p)(q)(r)(a)(b), an infinitesimally small chance. In any case, the administrative processes make establishing a corrupt practice very difficult. And, even when caught, the current processes leave pretty much the whole share of the rents captured by the official in tact. So, given the stakes involved, if you do not mind the infamy and can manage the inquiry process (not very difficult), it clearly pays to be corrupt!

The probabilities and cost at each stem vary based on how strict the officer concerned with the task is.

My Reading

My Reading

1. India needs more of this type of market makers and peer-to-peer lending platforms which can credibly signal the credit-worthiness of borrowers by using non-conventional sources and strategies of credit assessments,
The financial tech startups are trying to evaluate credit risk using a wide variety of consumer data including the digital footprint of customers arising out of social networks, ecommerce, mobile usage and geo-location. For example, IndiaLends claims to capture alternative information points such as bank statement, utility data, social data and customer interaction with the website... Startups like IndiaLends do not lend money of their own. Using their technology platform, they connect consumers with banks and financial institutions which results in better rates for the borrowers and a reduction in overall default rates... where they differentiate... from the bank is in scientifically matching the right borrower profile with the most relevant lender and hence reducing inefficiencies that lead to lower loan approvals, higher interest rates and sub-optimal loan amounts.
2. The most obvious indicator of state capability weakness is the gross inadequacy of personnel in many critical public agencies. As against a global average of one policeman per 450 people, India's has one for 709 people, with the numbers being 1298 and 1282 for Bihar and UP respectively. 
The problem here is that any discussion on increasing personnel strength gets conflated with the mistaken belief that the government is already too big and needs to be pruned down.

3. Ian Bremmer points to this map of the world would could well represent the beliefs of ISIS
4. Economic Times has a story on the increasing use of robots among India's car manufacturers,
Robots have begun to take over an array of functions from humans at car plants in India. Volkswagen India has 123 robots at its Pune plant while Hyundai Motor India, the subsidiary of the Korean carmaker, has 400 robots at its factory in Chennai... The Ford Sanand plant actually has 453 robots in the shop floor, with up to 90 per cent of the work automated... The entire body shop, most of the paint shop and parts of the final assembly line in these plants are now automated. Robots are performing functions ranging from welding to foundry operations to laser applications.
But robots are not likely to displace humans any time in the foreseeable future,
Still, despite the many benefits, companies will not be in a hurry to replace labour simply because robots are costly. A robot does the work of three technical workers, but it typically costs between $3,00,000 and $4,00,000. In other words, automation is 10 times more expensive than manual labour
5. Business Standard has an article on the findings of the Ashok Misra Committee which examined India's unregulated professional course entrance examinations coaching industry. The report proposes the establishment of a regulator for the coaching industry. The report highlights the scale of the industry,
According to an a 2013 survey by Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham), titled "Business of Private Coaching Centres in India", the size of the private coaching sector was $23.7 billion, or Rs 1.41 lakh crore. The survey also predicted that by 2015, it would grow to $40 billion, or Rs 2.39 lakh crore. The survey had collected data from 5,000 students and parents across 10 cities. It revealed that 87 per cent of primary and 95 per cent of high school students in the major cities took private tutoring. This industry grew by 35 per cent in the previous six years.
6. Global corporate bond offerings have crossed $2 trillion for the fourth consecutive year on the back of continuing monetary accommodation and signals that the ECB may be willing to continue and expand the ongoing QE.
7. Roula Khalaf has a nice summary of the differences between Isis and Al Qaeda. This is interesting,
The Sahwa movement comprised a group of Iraqi tribesmen that collaborated with the US a decade ago to root out the Iraqi branch of al-Qaeda. That branch took its revenge: it eventually became the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, better known as Isis... Isis seems obsessed with al-Qaeda, from which it split in 2013 following disagreements over the goals of jihad in Syria. Since then Isis has distinguished itself from its parent through its savagery (there is no limit to the violence it is willing to inflict) and its move to create a caliphate in parts of Iraq and Syria. 
8. Nice article in NYT on how Isis sustains itself - "they fight in the morning and they tax in the afternoon". The article describes how Isis is running the legitimate revenue collection operations of a regular government,
The better known of the Islamic State’s revenue sources — smuggling oil, plundering bank vaults, looting antiquities, ransoming kidnapped foreigners and drumming up donations from wealthy supporters in the Persian Gulf — have all helped make the group arguably the world’s richest militant organization. But as Western and Middle Eastern officials have gained a better understanding of the Islamic State’s finances over the past year, a broad consensus has emerged that its biggest source of cash appears to be the people it rules, and the businesses it controls...
(Isis) has set up a predatory and violent bureaucracy that wrings every last American dollar, Iraqi dinar and Syrian pound it can from those who live under its control or pass through its territory. Interviews... describethe group as exacting tolls and traffic tickets; rent for government buildings; utility bills for water and electricity; taxes on income, crops and cattle; and fines for smoking or wearing the wrong clothes. The earnings from these practices that mimic a traditional state total tens of millions of dollars a month, approaching $1 billion a year, according to some estimates by American and European officials. And that is a revenue stream that has so far proved largely impervious to sanctions and air raids... 
In Raqqa, the Syrian city that is now the de facto capital of the Islamic State, a department called Diwan al-Khadamat, or the Office of Services, sends officials through the city markets to collect a cleaning tax — 2,500 to 5,000 Syrian pounds, or about $7 to $14, per month depending on the size of the shop. Residents go to collection points to pay their monthly electricity and water bills, 800 Syrian pounds, or roughly $2.50 for electricity and 400 pounds, about $1.20, for water. Another Islamic State department, the Diwan al-Rikaz, or the Office of Resources, oversees oil production and smuggling, the looting of antiquities and a long list of other businesses now controlled by the militants. It operates water-bottling and soft-drink plants, textile and furniture workshops, and mobile phone companies, as well as tile, cement and chemical factories, skimming revenues from all of them...
The group has taken over the collection of car-registration fees, and made students pay for textbooks. It has even fined people for driving with broken taillights, a practice that is nearly unheard-of on the unruly roads of the Middle East. Fines are also included in the punishments meted out for breaking the strict living rules imposed by the Islamic State. 
In this context, the prevailing strategy to contain them, involving targeting their oil production and smuggling operations is unlikely to yield results,
Ultimately, though, many officials and experts said the Islamic State would probably be able to cover its costs even without oil revenue, and that so long as it controls large stretches of Iraq and Syria, including major cities, bankrupting the group would take a lot more than blowing up oil tankers. “These are all going to be little pinpricks into Islamic State financing unless you can take their revenue bases away from them, and that means the territory they control,” said Seth Jones, a terrorism expert at the RAND Corporation... the old strategy for stopping the flow of money to terrorist groups like Al Qaeda, which was largely based on cutting them off from donors in the Persian Gulf upon which they depend, does not apply to the Islamic State. 
9. The $160 bn reverse takeover of US-based Pfizer (maker of Viagra) by the Dublin-based Allergan (maker of Botox), an investment company trading pharmaceuticals businesses, is classic tax-inversion. It enables Pfizer to use its accumulated overseas profits without incurring US tax liability, thereby saving atleast $21 bn in future tax liabilities. It also joins Burger King and Liberty Global as brands which have fled overseas to avoid tax payments.

Apart from tax inversion, as John Gapper writes, it also highlights a new trend in pharmaceuticals industry,
Pharmaceuticals companies used to be research enterprises that discovered and developed drugs. Then they became marketing giants, skilled at selling as many blockbuster pills as possible. Lately, they have turned into mergers and acquisitions machines, buying and selling medicines invented by others. It is hard to view their evolution as progress... Instead of taking their chances by investing in drug discovery themselves, some wait until a smaller biopharmaceutical enterprise has done so and then try to buy the rights. It is less risky and uncertain for investors but it also tends to be extremely expensive. AbbVie, for example, paid $21bn for Pharmacyclics this year, largely to acquire a single blood cancer treatment.
In this case, Pfizer is buying up Botox!

10. Finally, the ECB has extended QE, but not by as much as anticipated. Apart from extending its 60 billion Euro a month bond buying program for another six months till March 2017 or "beyond" and purchase municipal bond in addition to government bonds, it has also lowered the deposit rate to minus 0.3 per cent.

Saturday, December 5, 2015

Should you prepay your home loan or invest the money?

The home loan EMI is divided into interest and principal repayment, and the proportion of each changes over the years as the interest component falls and the principal rises. So, if person prepays the loan, he will find a large amount of principal still outstanding, while the interest would already have been paid, assuming full term. When a loan is paid in part, the EMI for the remaining period is reworked. However, this is also based on the assumption of a full-term repayment, where the interest is front-ended.
person might find that repaying the loan will shrink his personal balance sheet since only the house will remain as an asset. If, on the other hand, he invests the money, his asset base will diversify and become bigger. Given the stability in the income, person should have no problem paying the EMI. If there is a risk, he will not need to sell the house, but can sell the investment to repay the loan as required.
person should ensure that his investment does not grow at a rate lower than the one paid on the home loan interest. He should also ensure that the money is kept in shares, mutual funds or other instruments, which can be sold when required. The investment can appreciate over time and be available for other needs compared with the investment in house, which is not flexible and cannot be used as required.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Power sector reforms

Power sector reforms - is this time different?

The markets have been largely appreciative of the latest round of power distribution companies debt restructuring. In this context, I am tempted to repost what I had written in the context of the 2012 debt restructuring. In particular, this graphic of the cumulative discom losses as a share of nominal GDP is very instructive - we are today at the same stage in terms of cumulative losses as in 2002.
So is this time any different? Atleast some do not think so.